Research Article

AI-Enhanced Physics Teacher Preparation: A Conceptual Design Framework for Developing Pre-Service Teachers' Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge

1 Department of Physics, Aminu Saleh College of Education, Azare, Bauchi State, Nigeria
2 Department of Science Education, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi State, Nigeria
3 Department of Physics, Sa’adu Zungur University, Gadau, Bauchi State, Nigeria
4 Department of Educational Foundation, Sa’adu Zungur University, Gadau, Bauchi State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: mbsabo1414@gmail.com
Published: Aug, 2026
Pages: 129–137
Views: 25
Downloads: 3

Abstract

The persistent difficulty students experience in learning Physics concepts has been widely linked to limitations in teachers' topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge (TSPCK). While teacher education programmes aim to strengthen pre-service teachers' instructional competence, many methodology courses remain insufficiently structured to support systematic TSPCK development and its enactment in classroom practice. Concurrently, the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has opened new possibilities for teacher education, yet limited research exists on how AI can be deliberately integrated into methodology courses to develop pre-service physics teachers' TSPCK. This conceptual paper presents a design framework for developing pre-service Physics teachers' TSPCK through the strategic integration of AI tools within a methodology course. Drawing on the TSPCK model (Mavhunga & Rollnick, 2013) and practice-based teacher education literature, the framework incorporates AI-enhanced Content Representations (CoRe), AI-assisted lesson observation and feedback, and AI-supported Video-Stimulated Recall (VSR) interviews to scaffold planning, enactment, and reflection. The paper synthesizes existing empirical evidence to justify the design features and demonstrates how AI tools can promote coherence between theory and practice in Physics teacher preparation. Ethical considerations, including bias, data privacy, and the role of AI as a pedagogical tool rather than a replacement for teacher reasoning, are discussed. The framework contributes to Physics education research by offering a context-responsive, technology-enhanced approach to TSPCK development that aligns with the transformative potential of AI in science teacher education.

References

  1. Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., .& McGrew, B. (2023). Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774.
  2. Achor, E. E., Ellah PhD, B. O., & Omaga, J. O. (2022). Misconceptions and difficult concepts as determinant of students’ academic engagement and retention in physics. Jurnal Varidika, 34(1), 42–52.
  3. Akinyemi, O. S. (2020). Exploring the development of pre-service teachers' Topic Specific PCK and its influence on learner outcomes [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand
  4. Can, H., & Mehmet, K. (2021). Enacted pedagogical content knowledge profiles of chemistry teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 512–540.
  5. Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468.
  6. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of science education and technology, 32(3), 444–452.
  7. Demszky, D., Liu, J., Hill, H. C., Jurafsky, D., & Piech, C. (2024). Can automated feedback improve teachers’ uptake of student ideas? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in a large-scale online course. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(3), 483–505.
  8. Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The effects of educational artificial intelligence-powered applications on teachers’ perceived autonomy, professional development for online teaching, and digital burnout. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57–76.
  9. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
  10. Isra, H., & Mufit, F. (2023). Analysis of students' misconceptions on Newton's laws of motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2569 (1), 012022.
  11. Jegede, S. A., & Adedayo, J. O. (2013). Enhancing physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through professional development. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(8), 45–52.
  12. Kind, V. (2014). Science teachers' content knowledge. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers' knowledge (pp. 71-90). Routledge.
  13. Kubsch, M., Kastaun, M., Wulff, P., Graulich, N., Ariely, M., Bergmann-Gering, A., ... & Zhai, X. (2025). Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14318.
  14. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge.
  15. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
  16. Mavhunga, E. (2020). Revealing the structural complexity of component interactions of topic-specific PCK when planning to teach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 861–887.
  17. Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1-2), 113–125.
  18. Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2017). Implementing PCK topic by topic in methodology courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 286–305.
  19. Mavhunga, E., & van der Merwe, D. (2020). Bridging science education's theory-practice divide: A perspective from teacher education through topic-specific PCK. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57 (7), 1021–1047.
  20. Mazibe, E. N., Gaigher, E., & Coetzee, C. (2024). The relationship between teachers' enacted PCK and student learning in fundamental concepts of electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education, 46(2), 167–189.
  21. McDermott, L. C. (2001). Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: Physics education research—The key to student learning. American Journal of Physics, 69(11), 1127–1137.
  22. Miheso, M. (2018). Examining the classroom teaching of beginning physical science teachers who graduated from a topic specific PCK based undergraduate programme [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
  23. Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2024). Instructors as innovators: A future-focused approach to new AI learning opportunities, with prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05181.
  24. Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of PCK in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299.
  25. Nilsson, P., & Karlsson, G. (2019). Capturing student teachers' PCK using CoRes and digital technology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(4), 392–410.
  26. Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., Sukamto, S., & Umam, R. (2020). Exploring the prospective of pre-service physics teacher's PCK. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1572(1), 012068.
  27. Oye, E., Frank, E., & Owen, J. (2024). Ethical considerations in AI-driven education. ResearchGate Preprint, 1–23
  28. Park, S., & Chen, Y. C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941.
  29. Phillips, H. N., & Condy, J. (2023). Teacher educators' preparation of pre-service teachers to learn from practice. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–12.
  30. Sabo, B. (in progress). Exploring the development of pre-service physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through a university method of teaching course [Unpublished manuscript]. Sa’adu Zungu University, Gadau, Bauchi State, Nigeria.
  31. Sanborn, A. N., Mansinghka, V. K., Griffiths, T. L., & Thomas, R. (2013). Learning the physics of motion: A cognitive science perspective. Cognitive Science, 37(3), 456–490.
  32. Shezad, F., Goswami, R., Shaheen, A., & Khan, I. (2025). AI in teacher training and professional development: A tool for continuous learning and skill enhancement. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 8(1), 179–191.
  33. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  34. Stender, A., Brückmann, M., & Neumann, K. (2017). Transformation of topic-specific professional knowledge into personal PCK through lesson planning. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 870–889.
  35. Zondi, N. N. (2018). Exploring the relationship between the pre-service teachers' nature of TSPCK acquired in planning and that enacted in classroom practice [Unpublished master's dissertation]. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
How to Cite

Sabo, B., Mohammed, A. S., Abubakar, D., & Abubakar, A. (2026). AI-Enhanced Physics Teacher Preparation: A Conceptual Design Framework for Developing Pre-Service Teachers' Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.67203/jossme.2026.rosnc0t7

B. Sabo, A. S. Mohammed, D. Abubakar, and A. Abubakar, "AI-Enhanced Physics Teacher Preparation: A Conceptual Design Framework for Developing Pre-Service Teachers' Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge," Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 129–137, August 2026. doi: 10.67203/jossme.2026.rosnc0t7

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn