Research Article

Developing 21st-Century Skills in Biology Education through Innovative Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools

S. Muhammad1*, S. Bello, Z. L. Gwandu
1 Kebbi State University of Science and Technology Aliero
* Corresponding author: sagir.muhammad@ksusta.edu.ng
Published: Aug, 2026
DOI: 10.67203/jossme.2026.jltz5iej
Pages: 1–15
Views: 40
Downloads: 5

Abstract

This study examines the role of innovative instructional practices in developing 21st-century skills in Biology education among secondary school students. Persistent underachievement in Biology, particularly in Nigeria, has been largely attributed to the continued reliance on traditional teacher-centered pedagogies that emphasize rote memorization rather than meaningful understanding and skill acquisition. Drawing on constructivist learning theory, particularly the works of Ausubel, Novak, and Piaget, the study explores how learner-centered approaches can enhance students’ cognitive engagement and knowledge construction. Adopting a qualitative descriptive approach, the study synthesizes evidence from existing literature and instructional practices to analyze the effectiveness of  innovative strategies, including concept mapping, 5E learning cycle, inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, collaborative learning, field-based activities, jigsaw strategy, and the integration of classroom technology. Findings from the literature review indicate that these strategies significantly improve students’ conceptual understanding, critical thinking, problem-solving abilities, collaboration, communication skills and core competencies required for the 21st century. The study concludes that the integration of innovative instructional practices fosters active learning and meaningful knowledge construction, thereby enhancing students’ academic achievement and preparedness for real-world challenges. It recommends sustained teacher professional development, curriculum innovation, and improved access to instructional resources to support effective implementation in secondary school Biology classrooms

Keywords

innovative instructional practices biology education 21st-century skills constructivist learning secondary education

References

  1. Adesoji, F. A., & Idika, M. I. (2022). Effects of concept mapping on students’ achievement in Biology. Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 45–58.
  2. Akcay, B. (2024). Sustainable Development Through STEM Education. Studies on Education, Science, and Technology, 144.
  3. Aksela, M., & Haatainen, O. (2019). Project-based learning (PBL) in practice: Active teachers' views of its' advantages and challenges. In International STEM in Education Conference (pp. 9–16). Queensland University of Technology.
  4. Alaagib, N. A., Musa, O. A., & Saeed, A. M. (2019). Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in
  5. Sudan. BMC medical education, 19, 1–8.
  6. Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill Education.
  7. Arthurs, L. A., & Kreager, B. Z. (2017). An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2073–2091
  8. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
  9. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  10. Brau, B. (2020). Constructivism. United Nations peace operations and International Relations theory.
  11. Buck, P. (2019). Subversion to the Economic: The Reconceptualization of Higher Education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield).
  12. Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS, 5(88–98).
  13. Coccia, M. (2017). Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(9), 1048–1061.
  14. Cox, J. (2020). What is the role of a teacher? Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com
  15. Dey, S. (2024). The Effect of Field Trip on Students’ Academic Performance in Biology at Secondary Level. Bharati International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Учредители: Gungun Publishing House, 2(5), 53–69.
  16. Dias, L., & Victor, A. (2017). Teaching and learning with mobile devices in the 21st century digital world: Benefits and challenges. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p339-344
  17. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Inquiry-based science education. CRC Press.
  18. Hamilton, B. (2018). Integrating technology in the classroom: Tools to meet the needs of every student. ASCD.
  19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2019). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 31(1), 1–24.
  20. Ibrahim, M., & Lawal, A. (2023). Technology integration and students’ achievement in Biology. International Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 210–225.
  21. Kayode, O. O., Ogundokun, R. O., Mohammed, R. E., and Olorundare, A. S. (2020). Review of innovative teaching strategies in senior secondary schools sciences. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.17.1.17018.
  22. Kolodner, J. L., et al. (2021). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(2), 181–214.
  23. Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: what is it? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491–495.
  24. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning and instruction. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Novak, J. D. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning-making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6(2), 167–193.
  26. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Nusrath, A., Dhananjaya, S. Y., Dyavegowda, N., Arasegowda, R., Ningappa, A., & Begum, R. (2019). Jigsaw Classroom: Is it an Effective Method of Teaching and Learning? Student's Opinions and Experience. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 13(2).
  28. O’Donnell, A. M., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2013). Introduction: What is collaborative learning? An overview. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 1–15.
  29. Okebukola, P. (2020). Enhancing science learning through concept mapping. African Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 23–37.
  30. Oyelekan, O. S., Igbokwe, E. F., & Olorundare, A. S. (2018). Science teachers’ utilization of innovative strategies. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 49–65.
  31. Palmberg, I., et al. (2015). Student teachers’ identification of species and biodiversity. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 549–571.
  32. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
  33. Rabindran, & Madanagopal. (2020). Piaget's Theory and Stages of Cognitive Development- An Overview. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences, 8(9), 2152–2157. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2020.v08i09.034
  34. Ramadani, A. S., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Hariyono, E. (2021). Profile of analytical thinking skills through inquiry-based learning in science subjects. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 45–60.
  35. Reimers, F. M., & Chung, C. K. (Eds.). (2019). Teaching and learning for the twenty-first century: Educational goals, policies, and curricula from six nations. Harvard education press
  36. Townley, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: Challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012
  37. Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2023). Paradigms in science education research. In Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–27). Routledge.
  38. Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R. W., & Powell, J. C. (2000). Teaching secondary school science. Prentice Hall.
  39. Wallgrün, J. O., Chang, J. S. K., Zhao, J., Trenham, P., Sajjadi, P., Simpson, M., & Klippel, A. (2024). Place-based education through immersive virtual experiences—preparing biology students for the field. Journal of Biological Education, 58(2), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2067580
  40. Yusuf, M. A., & Afolabi, A. (2020). Constructivist teaching strategies and students’ achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 67–80.
  41. Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A multi-perspective reflection on how indigenous knowledge and related ideas can improve science education for sustainability. Science & education, 29(1), 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
How to Cite

Muhammad, S., Bello, S., & Gwandu, Z. L. (2026). Developing 21st-Century Skills in Biology Education through Innovative Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools. Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.67203/jossme.2026.jltz5iej

S. Muhammad, S. Bello, and Z. L. Gwandu, "Developing 21st-Century Skills in Biology Education through Innovative Instructional Practices in Secondary Schools," Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, August 2026. doi: 10.67203/jossme.2026.jltz5iej

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles