Research Article

Fostering Honesty and Integrity in the Age of Gen-AI: Rethinking Ethical Scientific Attitudes in Science Education Research

Geoffrey Aondolumun Ayua1*, Tertsea Caleb Kwagh1
1 Science Education Department, Benue State University (now Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University), Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: ayuageoffrey@gmail.com
Published: Aug, 2026
DOI: 10.67203/jossme.2026.f7ovll68
Pages: 362–369
Views: 5
Downloads: 2

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Gen-AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini in science education has created unprecedented opportunities for learning, while simultaneously threatening core ethical scientific attitudes. This conceptual paper examines how honesty and integrity, as foundational values in science, are being tested in an AI-mediated educational environment. The paper argues that the ease of fabricating data, generating lab reports, and obscuring AI use necessitates a rethinking of how ethical scientific attitudes are taught, assessed and modelled in science education research. Based on literature in science ethics and educational technology, a three-dimensional ‘‘AI Disclosure-Accountability Model’’ is proposed emphasizing truthfulness in reporting, transparency in AI use, and responsibility for verifying AI outputs. The paper further discusses pedagogical strategies, assessment redesigns, and institutional policies needed to foster honesty and integrity among students and researchers. It concludes that intentional cultivation of ethical attitudes is essential to preserve the credibility and integrity of science education in the age of Gen-AI

Keywords

Gen-AI ethical scientific attitudes honesty integrity science education research academic integrity

References

  1. Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00011-8
  2. Ayua, G. A. (2018a, July). Imperatives of values education in Nigeria: Integrating prescriptive and analytic philosophy. Paper presented at the Primary and Tertiary Teacher Education Association of Nigeria (PATTEN) 15th Annual National Conference on Education and National Values: Trends and Imperatives, held at Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto State, Nigeria.
  3. Ayua, G. A. (2018b). Scientific attitudes and values for societal renewal: Critical examination of Gardner’s position and its implication on Nigeria and its education. Umaru Musa Yaradua University Journal of Education, 8(1), 314-319. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337167403
  4. Ayua, G. A. (2018c, October). Quality science education research among postgraduate scholars: Being updated with paradigm shift. Paper presented at the 2nd Biennial International Conference on Paradigm Shift in Postgraduate Studies for Service and Development, Organised by School of Postgraduate Studies (SPGS), Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, Nigeria Held at SPGS and CBN Centre of Excellence, ABU. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337163532
  5. Ayua, G. A., Kwagh, T. C., Okanche, S., Obonga, I. J., Obu, R. O., & Tavershima, U. A. (2026). Perceived influence of artificial intelligence chatbots on self-efficacy and attitude in science education research among undergraduate students in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 6(4), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026485
  6. Bohannon, M. (2023, June 08). Lawyer used ChatGPT in court and cited fake cases. A judge is considering sanctions. https://www.forbes.com/mollybohannon/2023/06./08/
  7. Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  8. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Council. (2023). Authorship and AI tools. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author
  9. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
  10. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  11. Eaton, S. E. (2023). A comprehensive academic integrity (CAI) framework: An overview. University of Calgary. https://prism.ucalgary.ca/handle/1880/116060
  12. Elali, F. (2023). AI-generated abstracts. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/ymyhmrdg5r.2
  13. Elali, F., & Rachid, L. (2023). AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706
  14. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Centre for Curriculum Redesign.
  15. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Gunnerman, S., Hullermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Scmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  16. Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choices in years 10 to 16. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. https://www.proquest.com/docview/301935075
  17. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development (Vol. 1). Harper & Row.
  18. Kumar, S., & Sharma, M. (2024). A comprehensive review of Gen-AI- from its origins to today and beyond. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19420.81281
  19. Lodge, J. M., Thompson, K., & Corrin, L. (2023). Mapping out a research agenda for generative artificial intelligence in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8445
  20. Macrina, F. L. (2014). Scientific integrity: Text and cases in responsible conduct of research (4th ed.). ASM Press. https://www.wiley.com/en-us
  21. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of literature. Education Sciences. 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/edusci13040410
  22. Resnik, D. B. (2015). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer.
  23. Sadasivan, V. S., Kumar, A., Soman, S., Malo, C., Aluru, S., & Reddy, S. (2023). Can AI-generated text be reliably detected? arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.11156. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11156
  24. Terhemba, W. K., & Ayua, G. A. (2025). Developing creative-hands among varied cognitive style upper-basic 3 students in Basic Science using creative exploration in Gboko. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics, and Science Education, 6(3), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.63561/fnas-jmse.v6i3.899
  25. Spinellis, D. (2025). False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name. Research Integrity Peer Review. 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00165-z
  26. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2023). Guidance for Gen-AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing
  27. Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT and AI: the game changer for science education. Journal of Chemical Education. 100(5), 1799-1800. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs/jchemed.3c00304
How to Cite

Ayua, G. A., & Kwagh, T. C. (2026). Fostering Honesty and Integrity in the Age of Gen-AI: Rethinking Ethical Scientific Attitudes in Science Education Research. Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.67203/jossme.2026.f7ovll68

G. A. Ayua, and T. C. Kwagh, "Fostering Honesty and Integrity in the Age of Gen-AI: Rethinking Ethical Scientific Attitudes in Science Education Research," Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 362–369, August 2026. doi: 10.67203/jossme.2026.f7ovll68

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles