Research Article

Improving Creativity through Inquiry-Based Learning: Evidence from STEM Secondary School Students in Kaduna State, Nigeria

Aliyu Suleiman Aliyu1*, Safiya Shafiu Muhammed2
1 Division of Agricultural College, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria
2 Institute of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: aliyusuleimanaliyu@jossme.org.ng
Published: Aug, 2026
DOI: 10.67203/jossme.2026.uuav4j5m
Pages: 391–401
Views: 7
Downloads: 1

Abstract

Creativity is a key twenty-first-century competency and a valued STEM education outcome, yet instruction in many Nigerian secondary schools remains teacher-centred, limiting students’ opportunities to develop creative thinking. This study investigated the effect of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) on the creativity of Senior Secondary II STEM students in Kaduna State, Nigeria, and examined whether the effect varied by gender. We adopted a quasi-experimental, pretest–posttest, nonequivalent experimental and control group design involving 180 students (96 males, 84 females) selected through multistage sampling from four public secondary schools. Data were collected using an adapted Scientific Creativity Test (reliability = 0.84). The experimental group received a six-week IBL intervention; the control group received conventional teacher-centred instruction. Data were analysed using descriptive statistic and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) at α = .05. Students exposed to IBL achieved significantly higher creativity scores than those in the control group, F(1, 177) = 86.46, p < .001, partial η² = .328, but gender had no significant influence, F(1, 176) = 0.21, p = .648, partial η² = .001. We conclude that IBL effectively enhances creativity among secondary STEM students irrespective of gender and recommend integrating inquiry-based pedagogy into STEM classroom practice and teacher professional development

Keywords

inquiry-based learning scientific creativity STEM education secondary school students constructivism

References

  1. Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-solving skills among 21st-century learners toward creativity and innovation ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52–58.
  2. Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929.
  3. Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2025). The scope of problem-based learning and integrated research education for primary learners. In N. J. Al-Thani & Z. Ahmad, Teaching and Learning with Research Cognitive Theory (pp. 25–43). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87544-1_2
  4. Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251–281.
  5. Arifin, Z., Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2592.
  6. Babalola, E. O., & Keku, E. (2024). Ethno-STEM integrated project-based learning to improve students’ creative thinking skills. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 1(2), 116–130.
  7. Chen, K., & Chen, C. (2021). Effects of STEM inquiry method on learning attitude and creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11).
  8. Cheng, L.-T., Smith, T. J., Hong, Z.-R., & Lin, H. (2021). Gender and STEM background as predictors of college students’ competencies in forming research questions and designing experiments in inquiry activities. International Journal of Science Education,43(17), 2866–2883. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1994167
  9. Danlami, K. B., Zakariya, Y. F., Balarabe, B., Alotaibi, S. B., & Alrosa, T. M. (2025). Improving students’ performance in geometry: An empirical evidence of the effectiveness of brainstorming learning strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1577912.
  10. Djaman, N., Ashari, N. W., Amrin, I. P., Amelia, N. P., & Anwar, N. I. (2026). Participatory action research on the implementation of STEAM-integrated problem-based learning. STEAM Journal for Elementary School Education, 2(01), 46–62.
  11. Dow, G. T. (2022). Defining creativity. In Creativity and innovation (pp. 5–21). Routledge.
  12. Fikri, R. A., Suwono, H., Susilo, H., & Kusairi, S. (2026). Fostering students’ creative thinking through inquiry-design-based STEM water purification project. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 1–24. https//doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202638877
  13. Funa, A. A. (2026). Effectiveness of integrated STEM and problem-based learning in improving students’ conceptual understanding in science. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102599.
  14. Ganajová, M., Orosová, R., Sotáková, I., & Letošníková, P. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based teaching on students’ attitudes toward science as an academic subject as well as science and technology in general. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1708139.
  15. Gillies, R. M. (2023). Using cooperative learning to enhance students’ learning and engagement during inquiry-based science. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1242.
  16. Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The effects of integrated STEM education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358–379.
  17. Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
  18. Kartal, S. K., Aslan, Y., & Çöğmen, S. (2026). Creative thinking in education: A comprehensive review on theory, instruction, and assessment. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences (Advance online publication).
  19. Khalil, R. Y., Tairab, H., Qablan, A., Alarabi, K., & Mansour, Y. (2023). STEM-based curriculum and creative thinking in high school students. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1195.
  20. Kim, J., Im, H., Ahn, D., & Cho, S. (2023). How does an inquiry-based instructional approach predict the STEM creative productivity of specialized science high school students? Education Sciences, 13(8), 773.
  21. Kotsis, K. T. (2025). A literature review on the misconceptions of pre-service teachers on inquiry-based learning in science education. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 3(3), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2025.3(3).07
  22. Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2025). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based learning approach. Routledge.
  23. Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290.
  24. Li, M.-M., & Tu, C.-C. (2024). Developing a project-based learning course model combined with the think–pair–share strategy to enhance creative thinking skills in education students. Education Sciences, 14(3), 233.
  25. Long, H., Kerr, B. A., Emler, T. E., & Birdnow, M. (2022). A critical review of assessments of creativity in education. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 288–323. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221084326
  26. Marianingsih, I. (2025). Creative thinking development in primary school students through inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Islamic Elementary Education, 3(1), 48–58.
  27. Moemeke, C. D., Chukwunenye, J. N., & Malik, N. A. (2025). Understanding the theoretical foundations of inquiry-based learning: Pivot for productive science education in Africa. Educational Considerations, 50(3), 4.
  28. Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking science education practices: Shifting from investigation-centric to comprehensive inquiry-based instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), 73.
  29. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD], (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63 en
  31. Ogunjobi, O., Ajimuse, M., Oyegbami, A., Famuwagun, T., Daramola, R., & Ajewole, P. (2025). Innovative learner-centred teaching method for the 21st century university lecturers. Journal of Innovation in Educational Assessment, 7(1), 220–239.
  32. Panjaitan, M. B., & Siagian, A. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning model to improve science process skills and scientific creativity of junior high school students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 380–386.
  33. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International University Press. Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2024). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
  34. Siew, N. M., & Lee, B. (2017). Scientific creativity test for fifth graders: Development and validation. Man in India, 97, 195–207.
  35. Singh, B. B. (2025). Pedagogical strategies: Teaching methods and approaches to promote student engagement and understanding. Bharati International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(2), 103-114. https//doi.org/10.70798/Bijmrd/ 03120011
  36. Singh, K. N. (2024). Promoting creativity and collaboration: Innovative interdisciplinary approaches to enhance STEM education and critical thinking in students. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 3(9), 546–551.
  37. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
  38. Twizeyimana, E., Shyiramunda, T., Dufitumukiza, B., & Niyitegeka, G. (2024). Teaching and learning science as inquiry: An outlook of teachers in science education. SN Social Sciences, 4(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00846-4
  39. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report: Gender and education. UNESCO Publishing.
  40. Vijayakumar Bharathi, S., & Pande, M. B. (2025). Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(2), 551–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00321-2
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard University Press.
  42. Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00090-2
  43. Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In J. Zajda, Globalisation and Education Reforms (Vol. 25, pp. 35–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
  44. Zakariya, Y. F., & Umahaba, R. E. (2025). Preparing preservice STEM teachers for AI driven classrooms: Doing teacher education programmes differently now. TECETEL Conference Proceedings.1(3), 212–221.https//doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17720342
How to Cite

Aliyu, A. S., & Muhammed, S. S. (2026). Improving Creativity through Inquiry-Based Learning: Evidence from STEM Secondary School Students in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.67203/jossme.2026.uuav4j5m

A. S. Aliyu, and S. S. Muhammed, "Improving Creativity through Inquiry-Based Learning: Evidence from STEM Secondary School Students in Kaduna State, Nigeria," Journal of Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 391–401, August 2026. doi: 10.67203/jossme.2026.uuav4j5m

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles